Should I ever read Baby Rudin?

Year 1 undergrad majoring Quant Finance, also going to double major in Maths. Just finished reading Ch 3 of Abbott's "Understanding Analysis".

I know Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" is one of the most (in)famous books for Mathematical Analysis due to its immense difficulty. People around me say Baby Rudin is not for a first read, but rather a second read.

But I'm thinking after I finish and master the contents in Abbott,

(1) Do I really need a second read on Analysis?

(2A) If that's the case, are there better alternatives to Baby Rudin?

(2B) If not, do I just move on to Real and Complex Analysis?

Any advice is appreciated. Thanks a lot!

Author: mcisnotmc